Why I am a Democrat (I guess)

First, I don't trust organized political parties.

And what kind of party could consider even briefly as a viable candidate for their nomination, Sarah Palin; patently unprepared, apparently a glib imbecile and unquestionably a craven quitter (trading governing Alaska for opining on Fox $pews). This is a party of Oz, the moneyed interests behind the curtain, dangling an earnest puppet in front to read their lines. The formula was perfected with Reagan, who though only a B list actor in Hollywood, could mimic Gary Cooper good enough for government work. Bush Sr. could not read his lines properly and went off script occasionally - note: real-life experience can ruin an otherwise perfectly good puppet. Dole is nobody's fool, though he did play one briefly on television during the campaign. W offered the masters again a perfect, natural puppet: seemingly earnest, incurious, compliant, while projecting the proper independent spirit. Though occasionally fumbling, he never deviated from the words given him by the cue cards, teleprompter, or earphone. No, that is a party of party-goers, socially comfortable people who can mock a purple heart earned while their candidate never left home, people who can question well-documented birth records while dismissing their candidate's "lost" service records, people who cling to trickle-down economic theories that have been long abandoned by their original proponents. Can't their little minds maintain even a foolish consistency? An unexamined life may still be worth living, but why not spend some of it thinking?

There's always independent, but groups have more influence than even the most wise and eloquent individual. Time to get with the program.

This is how the rich get richer and the poor get poorer...

The Republicans pledge to fight hard for tax cuts for the very rich and against continuing benefits to the unemployed. Why isn't this an easy win for the Democrats? Their reluctance to engage in class warfare is admirable, but it amounts to unilateral disarmament if not surrender. I would remind [them] that ...moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!

War Costs and Profits

PBS "News Hour" (that's "McNeil Lehrer" to us old folks), as is their practice, showed pictures and brief info on 9 service members who were killed recently in Afghanistan or Iraq. A few thoughts:

1. I was expecting 6 deaths because of the terrible news of that number killed by an Afghan policeman run amok, so it was extra difficult to see more;
2. WTF are we doing still engaged in these wars? Afghanistan might have been rescued back in 2001 when we first went in but now, after W and cronies led us astray into Iraq... maybe we should cut our losses;
3. Does "fair and balanced" (both lies) Fox "News" (spews) ever acknowledge the "costs" (euphemism for deaths) of these wars? I doubt it, but I won't tune in to their Goebbels-lite propaganda to confirm. Probably those costs are instead credited to the debit side on the war contractors balance sheets (war bucks).
4. Obama is the most amazing politician of my lifetime: impressive intellect, verbal skills, and humanity. Demonstrably sufficient to triumph over his fellow Dems and a marginally integrity-challenged (in both senses) opponent McCain. That said, maybe he has to toughen up a bit to compete against Republican lie-meisters soon to be in charge of the House.

God Bless the Whole WORLD. Amen.

Budget wisdom

"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pound ought and six, result misery."

Charles Dickens, David Copperfield, 1849

Real Football

How do we recover from the fascination of the World Cup to return to our own sports, which seem so parochial and slow by comparison? Perhaps we can try to incorporate some of the attractive aspects.

• No commercial breaks. Go get your beer at the risk of missing a key play.

• Game time. 90 minutes playing time plus “stoppage time” is about right, our games are way too long, with a 60 minute game taking 3½ hours on TV. How can it take nearly twice as long for a 1 hour game than a 1½ hour game? Commercials.

• Continuous action. Don't gimme a break, please. American football is 12 seconds of action followed a minute standing around. Soccer is almost nonstop.

• Importance. We have “national champions” but they are not the champions of the nation.

• Vuvuzela. Forget the cowbell, gimme more vuvuzela. The buzz is the buzz. Ok, maybe not, because that Pavlovian cue of the expectation of great sport will fade (eventually).

• Fitness. Soccer athletes look almost normal but fantastically fit. Instead of fantastically big and out of shape.

On the other hand, soccer could learn a couple things from American sports.

• Bad referees/calls. Many American sports allow the referees to review and potentially reverse their call, greatly improving fairness.

• Scoring. While it is true that the low score in soccer makes the “GOAL!” all the more exciting, a few more scores per game would reduce the fickleness of the outcome. How can this be done? Remove the offsides penalty and thereby encourage offense over defense and, incidentally, avoid over half the referee mistakes.

I think I'll look for a pick-up game in a local park and kick it around a bit. Maybe see what they think of getting rid of the offsides rule.

Consider the Source

Since Rupert Murdoch's News Corp bought the Wall Street Journal, the stodgy but once-credible paper has been losing altitude in its reporting of political news. You might hope that this business paper would remain objective in reporting business news. Not bloody likely. Here are today's headlines from Google News reporting results of the last quarter:

• Good news from the Wall Street Journal itself: News Corp Raises Outlook For Annual Operating Income
• Bad news from competitor BusinessWeek: News Corp. Fourth-Quarter Profit to Fall on TV, Film
• A mixture of good and bad news from the Associated Press: News Corp. profit down but advertising rebounds

This one-man Orwellian apotheosis, Murdoch, continues to infect America news with his adopted British cynical disregard for objective news teamed with a native Aussie tenacity.

Now Fox-WSJ are furiously beating a drum along with Fox “news” that President Obama was slow to respond to BP's oil drilling disaster in the gulf. They will go to any length and sink to any depth to blame the President and divert attention from this abject failure of big business. Yesterday, they 'reported' (and decided) that the National Guard shooting of Kent State students 40 years ago was somehow 'triggered' by the (unarmed, non-violent) demonstrators themselves. Shameless.

DIY:Water Leak Detection and Pump Cut-Off

Ever worry that if your water pipes leaked or broke, that your electric water pump would fill the basement with well water? An alarm is no good if you're not home to hear it. A sump pump would mitigate, maybe, but it could only compete with the water pump. I wanted a water detector that would automatically cut-off power to the pump.

Having no luck finding a product that does this, I assembled one from available parts. I stumbled across one website where do-it-yourselfers made some excellent suggestions. Unfortunately, one product they recommended had been discontinued in favor of an overly-complex home automation system (X-10). I wanted a simple system: just a highly reliable detector and relay. These components seemed to be the best available.

• Parts:

1. Detector: Winland “Water Bug 200” (WNWB200) with relay output, 1 remote sensor probe included, plus DXAdapter500 mA for powering detector, ~$70 from Absolute Automation.
2. Relay: Opto 22 “120D25” (120V, DC controlled, 25 amp capacity), ~$25 from Allied Electronics (authorized dealer; it is cheaper on Ebay but why risk a defective or counterfeit part to save a few bucks?) This is a solid state relay (SSR), no moving parts and very reliable. I would recommend buying the cover because by covering the contacts it will make the installation safer. My pump is on a 15 amp circuit, so 25 amps is over spec.

• Connections: (see figure). "NC" on the Waterbug means "normally closed", i.e., a closed circuit, under normal, non-alarm conditions. The detector must be powered to allow the relay to close and power the water pump, so in that respect the system is 'fail safe'.
  

• Testing: As the water pump was operating, I placed the water sensor on top of a dampened paper towel. The water pump stopped instantly with no sound from the relay. When the sensor was removed from the damp towel, the pump restarted. I think this shows the system works. However, you are entirely on your own applying these observations, I make no guarantees of any kind.
  

Please post any comments or questions. Good luck!
Note: I recommend the cover, which snaps on an protects the contacts, and the matching heat sink from Opto22. The heat sink protects the relay when the pump runs for extended periods, such as when you are taking a shower or watering the lawn. The cover is cheap. The heat sink is about $35, so about $10 more than the SSR. (added April 17,2011).